Rich and Poor Cheat for Different Reasons

In certain circumstances, it's the poor who are more likely to cheat. The difference is that the rich do wrong to help themselves, while the poor do wrong to help others. In several experiments reported in an upcoming issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology… the studies suggest a straightforward sequence: Money leads to the perception that one is higher in the social hierarchy, which in turn leads to a sense of power, which in turn leads to a greater willingness to cheat for selfish reasons.

People with less money (and therefore less power), however, are more communal. They need to rely on each other to get by, and as a result, research shows, they’re more compassionate and empathically accurate. Breaking rules is always risky, but social cohesion is paramount — so you do what it takes to help those around you.

The researchers think their findings could lead to some easy practical applications. If you’re speaking to higher-class individuals, you might want to appeal to their selfishness and warn that cheating will ultimately backfire. But when talking to those with fewer resources, you might be better off noting that their actions could harm those around them.

Matthew Hutson, New York Magazine

Driven to Obligation

When we are locked into imperative thinking, we hold our absolute conviction so tightly that we have little or no recognition of our choice to say no! Obligation becomes our driving force. Relationships with other people and our responsibilities to them then become matters of dread, resentment, guilt.

Our need for a structured, orderly life can be so powerful that we refuse to make allowances for choices. To us, circumstances are either black or white. Once we settle upon a conviction or preference, we feel rigidly obligated to abide by it, with little variation.

Imperative people are almost afraid to allow for the luxury of choices. We feel the need to minimize our risks by sticking to the rules that we have made for ourselves.

Les Carter, Imperative People: Those Who Must Be in Control

Cunningham’s Law

Cunningham’s Law is the observation that the best way to get a good or right answer is not to ask a question; it’s to post a wrong answer. So, if you want to know the leading causes of World War I, go to a history forum and post, “World War One was entirely caused by the British.” Sit back, grab some popcorn, and wait for the angry — yet probably informed — corrections to come flying in. 

Socrates, did a lot of it. Socrates would sit on some public bench and talk to whoever happened to sit next to him. He’d often open his dialogues by presenting a false or deeply flawed argument and go from there. He would ironically agree with whatever his partner would say, but then raise a seemingly innocuous question to challenge that position.

“Socratic irony” is where you pretend to be ignorant of something so you can get greater clarity about it. In short, it’s a lot like Cunningham’s Law.

Here are two ways you can use Cunningham’s Law:

The Bad Option: Have you ever been in a group where no one can decide what decision to make, and so you hover about in an awkward, polite limbo? “What restaurant shall we go to?” gets met with total silence. Instead try saying, “Let’s go to McDonald’s” and see how others object and go on to offer other ideas. 

The Coin Toss: If you’re unsure about any life decision — like “should I read this book or that book next?” or “Should I leave my job or not?” — do a coin toss. Heads you do X, tails you do Y. You are not actually going to live by the coin’s decision, but you need to make a note of your reaction to whatever outcome came of it. Were you upset at what it landed on? Are you secretly relieved? It’s a good way to elicit your true thoughts on a topic.

Jonny Thomson writing in BigThink

How To Make Someone Truly Feel Heard

Be intentional about learning what the other person wants to communicate and respond to their feelings.

Listen to what they’re telling you and suppress the urge to fix the issue, problem solve, or change the way they are feeling about the situation.

Put your own feelings aside to create a space where another person can speak his or her mind—which requires staying calm.  

Suspending judgment and simply taking in what is being said can go a long way towards helping someone feel heard or diffusing an argument.

Show that you are actively listening and are truly understanding what the other person is saying by mirroring back what someone has said. Include phrases like ‘it sounds like’ or ‘it seems like.’

Take the time for silence in a discussion, showing that you’re processing what is being talked about and giving it the space that it needs to sink in properly. 

Edited from Jeremy Brown writing in Fatherly

17 Articles about the Business of Running an AI

Using Projects to Avoid Making Changes

If you are having trouble getting motivated to finish a project, consider the possibility that finishing that report (or whatever your project involves) means facing a void. The project is a distraction so that you don't have to see the emptiness outside of it. You slow down the completion until another project emerges to play the role of another distraction. You’re putting off looking at uncomfortable truths about yourself 

While in the midst of a deadline-driven project, you feel like you have a clear identity because your purpose is defined by the project's needs. But if the projects was removed from your life, would you have justification for thinking of yourself as someone of value? Is your worth  bound in the projects?

So it is with serious relationships, where someone provides a sense of purpose, giving definition and a sense of worth.

If you were forced to sit down and write out the definition of who you are without the benefit of a title (manager, employee, project manager) or relationship (wife, girlfriend, mother) would you lack the means to define yourself?

A suggestion: Spend time doing things that allow you to center yourself. Give yourself downtime to listen. Whatever brings you to stillness will put you in a good position to allow the transition to take hold and internalize it so you don’t miss the opportunity to make a paradigm shift toward greater emotional and spiritual health. Allow yourself to just "be" and reconnect with the world around you (its sounds, smells, tastes, touches, and sights).

Stephen Goforth

 

Distraction

You cannot fully unleash your genius in the three-minute increments you have between distractions. Unfortunately, for many of us distraction has become a habit — one that has been so often and routinely reinforced that it is extremely difficult to break. Persuasive technology — technology that uses sophisticated techniques from behavioral psychology to “persuade” us to keep engaging with it — exacerbates the problem. So, over time, as our habit gains strength, we go looking for distraction. When things get quiet, or a task gets boring or frustrating, we reach for our phones. 

Maura Thomas writing in the Harvard Business Review

The Most Important Basic Generative AI Terms to Know  

Algorithms –  Direct, specific instructions for computers created by a human through coding that tells the computer how to perform a task.

The code follows the algorithmic logic of “if”, “then”, and “else.”  An example of an algorithm would be:         

  • IF the customer orders size 13 shoes,         

  • THEN display the message ‘Sold out, Sasquatch!’;         

  • ELSE ask for a color preference.     

Besides rule-based algorithms, there are machine-learning algorithms used to create AI. In this case, the data and goal is given to the algorithm, which works out for itself how to reach the goal.

There is a popular perception that algorithms provide a more objective, more complete view of reality, but they often will simply reinforce existing inequities, reflecting the bias of creators and the materials used to train them.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) – Basically, AI means “making machines intelligent”, so they can make some decisions on their own without the need for any human interference.

The phrase was coined in a research proposal written in 1956. The current excitement about the field was kick-started in 2012 by an online contest called the ImageNet Challenge, in which the goal was getting computers to recognize and label images automatically.

Big Data – This is data that’s too big to fit on a single server.

Typically, it is unstructured and fast-moving. In contrast, small data fits on a single server, is already in structured form (rows and columns), and changes relatively infrequently. If you are working in Excel, you are doing small data. Two NASA researchers (Michael Cox and David Ellsworth) first wrote in a 1997 paper that when there’s too much information to fit into memory or local hard disks, “We call this the problem of big data.”

Generative AI – Artificial intelligence that can produce content (text, images, audio, video, etc.) such as ChatGPT.  

It operates similarly to the “type ahead” feature on smartphones that makes next-word suggestions. Gen AI is based on the particular content it was trained on (exposed to).

GPT – The “GPT” in ChatGPT stands for Generative Pre-Trained Transformer. 

Hallucinations – when an LLM provides responses that are inaccurate responses or not based on facts. 

Hallucination – the AI saying things that sound plausible and authoritative but simply aren’t so.

Large Language Models (LLMs) – AI trained on billions of language uses, images and other data. It can predict the next word or pixel in a pattern based on the user’s request. ChatGPT and Google Bard are LLMs.

The kinds of text LLMs can parse out:

  • Grammar and language structure.

  • How a word is used in language (noun, verb, etc.).

  • Word meaning and context (ex: The word green may mean a color when it is closely related to a word like “paint,” “art,” or “grass.”

  • Proper names (Microsoft, Bill Clinton, Shakira, Cincinnati).

  • Emotions (indications of frustration, infatuation, positive or negative feelings, or types of humor).

Machine learning (ML) – AI that spots patterns and improves on its own. 

An example would be algorithms recommending ads for users, which become more tailored the longer it observes the users‘ habits (someone’s clicks, likes, time spent, etc.). 

Data scientists use ML to make predictions by combining ML with other disciplines (like big data analytics and cloud computing) to solve real-world problems. However, while this process can uncover correlations between data, it doesn’t reveal causation. It is also important to note that the results provide probabilities, not absolutes.

Neural Network – In this type of machine learning computers learn a task by analyzing training examples. It is modeled loosely on the human brain—the interwoven tangle of neurons that process data in humans and find complex associations.

Neural networks were first proposed in 1944 by two University of Chicago researchers (Warren McCullough and Walter Pitts) who moved to MIT in 1952 as founding members of what’s sometimes referred to as the first cognitive science department. Neural nets were a major area of research in both neuroscience and computer science until 1969. The technique then enjoyed a resurgence in the 1980s, fell into disfavor in the first decade of the new century, and has returned like gangbusters in the second, fueled largely by the increased processing power of graphics chips. 

Open Source AI – When the source code of an AI is available to the public, it can be used, modified, and improved by anyone. Closed AI means access to the code is tightly controlled by the company that produced it.

The closed model gives users greater certainty as to what they are getting, but open source allows for more innovation. Open-source AI would include Stable Diffusion, Hugging Face, and Llama (created by Meta). Closed Source AI would include ChatGPT and Google’s Bard.

Prompts – Instructions for an AI. It is the main way to steer the AI in a particular direction, indicate intent, and offer context. It can be time-consuming if the task is complex.  

Prompt Engineer – An advanced user of AI models, a prompt engineer doesn’t possess special technical skills but is able to give clear instructions so the AI returns results that most closely match expectations.

This skill can be compared to a psychologist who is working with a client who needs help expressing what they know. 

Red Teaming  –  Testing an AI by trying to force it to act in unintended or undesirable ways, thus uncovering potential harms.

The term comes from a military practice of taking on the role of an attacker to devise strategies.  

While some of these definitions are a bit of an oversimplification, they will point the beginner in the right direction. -Stephen Goforth

Should Students Choose Higher-Paying Majors?

Pushing students from science into the humanities tended to decrease their later-life wages — that’s finding is not surprising. But the converse also appeared to be true: Pushing students from the humanities into science also tended to, if anything, decrease their wages. While there are certain very high-paying majors (like engineering, economics, and computer science) that increase students’ earning potential even if they would prefer to study something else, helping students to study their most-preferred major generally seems to provide long-run financial benefits even in the humanities.

Students should know that when it comes to choosing a college degree, small differences in average-wage-by-major statistics shouldn’t be taken too seriously. Especially when the average wage differences between majors are not very big, students should put their own strengths first and not let the statistics cloud their understanding of their own interests.

Zachary Bleemer writing in the The Chronicle of Higher Ed

11 Quotes Worth Reading about AI in the Newsroom from Recent Articles

The Associated Press today released guidance on how it uses generative artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT and will update its AP Stylebook to reflect a new era for newsrooms. While AP staff may experiment with ChatGPT with caution, they do not use it to create publishable content,” according to the standards. “Any output from a generative AI tool should be treated as unvetted source material.” Poynter  

How Will Artificial Intelligence Change the News Business? Here are three theories of the case. NY  Mag

A multitude of leading newsrooms have recently injected code into their websites that blocks OpenAI’s web crawler, GPTBot, from scanning their platforms for content. The deep archives and intellectual property rights of these news organizations are immensely valuable — arguably crucial — to training A.I. models such as ChatGPT in efforts to provide users with accurate information. Meanwhile, the Associated Press went a different route, hammering out its own licensing deal with the A.I. developer, though it notably did not share key terms of the agreement. CNN

Wired magazine has a page dedicated to explaining how its journalists use AI tools (to suggest headlines or potential cuts to shorten a story, the policy states) and how they don’t (no AI-generated images instead of stock photos, according to the policy). Wired makes it clear to readers that these policies may change as the technology does. Poynter 

Ultimately, AI is a prism. Information goes into it and the bot can refract a spectrum of stories and simulated perspectives, but it may also distort those views, missing the nuances and human elements that give local news its heart and soul. Understanding and staying abreast of these technological developments is crucial, but so is maintaining a healthy skepticism. Joe Amditis on Medium

Lede AI (was developed) to help newsrooms cover sports games they would have otherwise missed. Lede AI draws from a national database of sports results submitted by fans to generate short articles that are automatically published after a game ends. the AI-written summaries sometimes missed “factual nuances” in stories, and the AI-generated text could be “corny” and repetitive. Poynter 

OpenAI, the parent company to ChatGPT, will fund a new journalism ethics initiative at New York University's Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute with a $395,000 grant. Axios

Several news organizations, writers and photographers groups are pushing to be involved in creating standards for the use of artificial intelligence, particularly as it concerns intellectual property rights and the potential spread of misinformation. Associated Press

The 'Irish Times' mistakenly publishes fake article written by AI. The person behind the deception, whose identity remains unknown, had used an artificial intelligence (AI) program to create the text and images of the writer.  Le Monde

A new, completely AI-driven website called the LocalLens wants to be a kind of metal detector for local news — claiming to surface stories that might otherwise remain buried. Joe Amditis writing on Medium

The New York Times has decided not to join a group of media companies attempting to jointly negotiate with the major tech companies over use of their content to power artificial intelligence. Semafor 

Allowing for Transitions

It's easy to believe you are in a different place in life than you really are-- it's hard to know when you have passed through a transition. You only know it when you are on the other side of it, and are able to glance back and say, "Look at that! Look what I just went through!" 

The in-between time is what William Bridges calls the "neutral zone."  During this period, you will be in the process of "destroying what used to be."  You will be "dismantling" while undertaking “some new building."

Bridges is most helpful in pointing out that life's changes are driven by the desire to reach a goal, while life's transitions:

"Start with letting go of what no longer fits or is adequate to the life stage you are in... although it might be true that you emerge from a time of transition with the clear sense that it is time for you to end a relationship or leave a job, that simply represents the change that your transition has prepared you to make. The transition itself begins with letting go of something that you have believed or assumed, some way you've always been or seen yourself, some outlook on the world or attitude toward others." 

It's an internal move of greater significance than any external move.

  Stephen Goforth

Generative AI Prompt Suggestions  

Approach

You aren’t supposed to just ask a question of an AI and walk away once an answer is devised and presented like a Google search. The better use is to carry on a conversation with the AI app.

To Get more Accurate Answers

·       Include examples of what you want it to do.

·       Tell the AI to ask you questions so it can give you a robust answer. This will give you some things to think about related to what you are trying to create. “Before you start, ask me any questions that you need answered to help me best solve my problem.”

·       “Provide sources for new information (or a specific piece of information)”

·       “Give me a list of the fundamental facts on which your response relied.”

·       "Base your answer on these following facts…”

·       Tell it to "think step-by-step," so it'll break down its solution into bite-size chunks. Including an example of this process is even better.

·       If you see a repeated factual error in the response, tell it to “rewrite the answer with the following changes in mind."

·       Tell the AI to be curt in its responses and you’ll get a more to-the-point response.

·       Tell the AI to be elaborate in its responses and you’ll get longer amplifications.

·       Disagree with the AI as to its stated responses and prod the AI into defending things.

·       Make a pretend type of scenario that you want the AI to contextually include.

Gathering Information

Ask it to research a specific topic and list the most important or basic information.

Illustration

“Give me a story to illustrate x”

Summaries

“Summarize the documents/press releases/ etc. below.”

“Summarize this article in a punchy paragraph”

“Format this information into bullet points”

“Define/expand/explain/translate”/order chronologically/turn into listicle/make into an explainer”

Story Type

“Rewrite as an informative news story focused on fact”

“Rewrite as an human interest feature” 

Feedback

Provide feedback on writing—what’s missing, editing for style, etc. 

“Rewrite/edit/format”

“Provide an overall critique of your style on a specific document.”

“Rewrite/shorten/expand the second paragraph”

“Add quotes from the CEO” or other official.

Prompt for an itemized list of suggested changes, so that you can make your own judgments. Don't simply accept the A.I. output.        

Writing Style

“Start with an anecdotal lead/quote/example/data/statistics”

“Write with a journalistic/academic/casual/formal style”

“Write in the style of (a particular writer)”

“Format numbers/dates/citations/headlines/capitalizations/etc in this way…”

Length

“This article should be 500 words long, divided into at least 6 paragraphs”

“Sentences of no less/more than x words”        

Study Feedback

“When I am correct, tell me how my response could have been better and when I’m wrong help guide me to the correct answer and give me a clever way to remember it.”  

Journalism

Write a headline for this article

Suggest SEO for the following article

Brainstorm for news article ideas based on a press release or quote.

Images

Reverse engineer real images to find new prompts.

Ask the AI to help you develop better prompts.  

Image Formula

Image content (cat, dog) + style (photo, painting, illustration, film stills) + framing (point-of-view, background) + lighting (soft light, dramatic lighting, sunset) + color + level of realism & detail   

Example 1: "Person with strong determined attitude, forest fire background, close-up shot, purple and green color scheme, dark lighting, realistic."

Example 2: “A child playing on a sunny happy beach, their laughter as they build a simple sandcastle, emulate Nikon D6 high shutter speed action shot, soft yellow lighting.”

Battling Tradition in a Organization

Without understanding that a tradition is an outdated way to fulfill a good intent, you will just ignore or fight it. But, armed with that understanding, you can argue with tradition — debating what needs to stay and what has to change — precisely in order to keep the organization’s intent alive.

Gianpiero Petriglieri writing in the Harvard Business Review