24 Articles about AI & Academic Scholarship

Peer Review Paranoia The system is built on trust between scholars. AI is undermining that. – Chronicle of Higher Ed

AI Makes Research Easy. Maybe Too Easy. – Wall Street Journal

AI-generated scientific hypotheses lag human ones when put to the test – Science.org

JAMA Editors on Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review – JAMA  

AI tool labels more than 1000 journals for ‘questionable,’ possibly shady practices - Science.org

AI for Scientific Integrity: Detecting Ethical Breaches, Errors, and Misconduct in Manuscripts – Frontiers  

What counts as plagiarism? AI-generated papers pose new risks - Nature

Image fraud in nuclear medicine research – Springer

Does ChatGPT Ignore Article Retractions and Other Reliability Concerns? - Wiley

NIH to reject research applications written by AI – Beckers Hospital Review

AI-based fake papers are a new threat to academic publishing says journal editor – Times Higher Ed 

AI-Assisted Tools for Scientific Review Writing: Opportunities and Cautions. – ACS Publications 

Comparing AI-generated and human peer reviews: A study on 11 articles – Science Direct 

Evaluating the potential risks of employing large language models in peer review - Wiley

One-fifth of computer science papers may include AI content – Science.org

Artificial intelligence as author: Can scientific reviewers recognize GPT-4o-generated manuscripts? - Science Direct 

Fraudulent Scientific Papers Are Rapidly Increasing, Study Finds – New York Times 

AI can’t learn from what researchers don’t share – Research Professional News

AI content is tainting preprints: how moderators are fighting back.” - Nature

AI can simplify the process enormously and help publishers get ahead of the industry’s upheavals,” says publisher’s head of marketing. – Research Information

 AI Writing Disclosures Are a Joke. Here’s How to Improve Them. - Chronicle of Higher Ed

Make all research data available for AI learning, scientists urge – Research Professional News

Machine learning model flags almost 10 percent of cancer research literature as being paper mill papers – Biorxiv

AI-based research mentors: Plausible scenarios and ethical issues – Taylor & Francis Online