27 Recent Articles about AI & Academic Scholarship

Where Does Publishing’s A.I. Problem Leave Authors and Readers? – New York Times

Dozens of AI disease-prediction models were trained on dubious data – Nature   

Frontiers issues AI guidance spanning full publishing lifecycle – Research Information  

Tackle ‘AI slop’ in education research ‘or lose teacher trust’ – Times Higher Ed

Plagiarised research passed automated tests, and I detected it – but only because it copied my work – Conversation

If a Large Language Model can replicate your scientific contribution, the problem is not the LLM – Nature

Bloodhound code sniffs out copied-and-pasted numerical data – Retraction Watch

Scientists Invented a Fake Disease Caused by Blue Light—Now It's in Medical Papers  - Inc

AI Is a Better Researcher Than You That claim got a political scientist denounced. Is it true? – Chronicle of Higher Ed  

Cite unseen: when AI hallucinates scientific articles- Science.org

Hallucinated citations are polluting the scientific literature. What can be done? - Nature 

Anonymisation in research must be overhauled for AI era – Research Professional News

What is p hacking, is it bad, and can you get AI to do it for you? – Towards Data Science

Policies Permitting LLM Use for Polishing Peer Reviews Are Currently Not Enforceable – ArXiv

A citation alert led researchers to a network of fake articles. But who is benefiting? – Retraction Watch  

More AI will not beat the Red Queen - Wonkhe

STM Plants a Flag About Responsible Use of Research Content in GenAI – Scholarly Kitchen   

Prompt injection in manuscripts: exploiting loopholes or crossing ethical lines? – Springer  

Seeing Is Believing? Scientific Misconduct and the Detection of Problematic Images – International Anesthesia Research Society

How to build an AI scientist: first peer-reviewed paper spills the secrets - Nature  

Major conference catches illicit AI use — and rejects hundreds of papers - Nature

An AI-authored paper just passed peer review. The scientific community isn’t ready – Scientific American  

Wikipedia Bans AI-Generated Content – 404 Media

The European Research Council sets out firm line on use of AI in peer review – Research Professional News  

AI models fail to accurately pick out which social science studies could be replicated - OSF

Generative AI in academic writing: a comparison of human-authored and ChatGPT-generated research article titles - Nature

Restoring Trust in Science: Storytelling, AI, and Integrity in Scholarly Publishing – ISMPP (webinar recording)