Studying AI Writing

Just as young artists learn to paint by copying masterpieces in museums, students might learn to write better by copying good writing. One researcher suggests that students ask ChatGPT to write a sample essay that meets their teacher’s assignment and grading criteria. The next step is key. If students pretend it’s their own piece and submit it, that’s cheating. They’ve also offloaded cognitive work to technology and haven’t learned anything. But the AI essay can be an effective teaching tool, in theory, if students study the arguments, organizational structure, sentence construction and vocabulary before writing a new draft in their own words. -Hechinger Report

The AI Motivational Issue

Students who use AI tools to complete assignments tend to do better on homework—but worse on tests. They’re getting the right answers, but they’re not learning. The findings suggest that simply believing information came from an LLM makes people learn less. It is like they think the system is smarter than them, so they stop trying. That’s a motivational issue, not just a cognitive one. AI doesn’t have to make us passive. But right now, that’s how people are using it. -Wall Street Journal

AI Advice for Students

AI Advice for Students

1- Think Beyond Academic Integrity

         Not just “Is this cheating or not cheating?”

         But also, “Am I taking the opportunity to learn, practice, and cultivate my skills?”

To some students, college now feels like, “How well I can use ChatGPT.” Others describe writing essays as a coordination problem: get the prompt, feed it to the bot, skim the output, add some filler, hit submit. No thinking required, just interface management. 

2-Define Your own Educational goals

Ask yourself: “Besides grades, what are my goals as a student?”

Prioritize learning and skill development

Seize opportunities to get the practice you need to become a better thinker, writer, and communicator. 

3-Prompt to Challenge your Thinking

Instead of outsourcing your thinking (“Suggest a thesis statement I can use for my essay.”). Look for ways to think critically about the subject (“Ask me tough questions to help me figure out my thesis statement.”).

Don’t just ask, “Am I outsourcing the writing to AI?” Ask, “Am I outsourcing the thinking to AI?” We must use AI to expand our mind’s capacity to engage, rather than using it to outsource our thinking.  

4- Focus on AI Literacy & Integration

Unless you want to build AI systems and become a data scientist, focus on taking outdated processes and updating them to make use of the available AI tools. Understanding the benefits and limitations of AI in light of ethics should be the goal, along with figuring out how to mesh it into your workday. 

5- Double Down on your Humanity

•  We can’t let it strip us of our humanity.

•  Optimistically, AI may be “a piece of technology that, instead of replacing humanity, amplifies it.”

•  We must retain oversight & not lose ourselves by depending on the machine.

•  Doubling down on what makes you human may be what saves you from being replaced or minimized by AI. 

6- Get Well-rounded         

Be well- rounded in liberal arts: think of your gen ed classes as now core classes. Focus specifically on growing these skills: analytic thinking, creativity, information literature, resilience, agility, leadership, self-motivation, empathy, curiosity. Their value will rise as AI takes over routine tasks.  

7- Distinguish between AI-generated content, AI-assisted content, & AI-supplemented content

Group A ❌                    Group B ✅                              Group C 🤔

AI-generated content              AI-assisted content/writing                AI-supplement content

Facilitated writing/learning    

AI-generated content ❌ is entirely produced by the AI or sections are produced by the AI, based on detailed instructions (prompts) provided by the author. Some AI is best thought of as a set of automation tools that function as closed systems that do their work without oversight—like ATMs and dishwashers. 

In academia, it is not acceptable under normal circumstances unless there are significant and clear reason why this was necessary. However, in business, it is likely to be treated as acceptable when the content is merely informational and not intended to be creative. The focus in this situation is accuracy and speed with minimal effort as opposed to authenticity. For instance, a summary of a business meeting or an email answering a particular question about the business, where it is assumed, the writer may incorporate AI-generated content.

Group B ✅ is work that is predominantly written by an individual but has been improved with the aid of AI tools. AI is part of the process. The author remains in control, and the AI merely acts as a polishing tool. As opposed to automation tools, these collaboration tools—like chain saws and word processors. In any given application, AI is going to automate or it’s going to collaborate, depending on how we design it and how someone chooses to use it.

This kind of assistance is generally accepted by most publishers as well as the Committee on Publication Ethics, without the need for formal disclosure. This includes: creating outlines, improving clarity, grammar, summarizing, brainstorming, generating transcription, condensing notes, creating study guides, practice questions, editing, and suggesting alternative approaches to a problem. 

Group C 🤔 includes changing phrasing, generating a citation list, revising sentence structure, reducing word count, etc. Writers and publishers disagree about whether using AI in this way is ethical or not.

How Students are Using AI: Here's what the Data Tell Us

  • AI use by students is increasing.

  • The higher the education level, the more likely that students will use AI. 

  • Business, STEM, and social-science majors are more likely to use AI and are less likely to have concerns about using it than humanities majors. 

  • Top uses by students: information or getting explanations (50-70 percent of respondents in the studies cited above); generating ideas or brainstorming (40-50 percent); and writing support, including checking grammar, editing, starting a paper, and drafting an essay (30-50 percent).

  • 86 percent of students who use ChatGPT for assignments say their use was undetected.

  • A plurality of students think AI will have both positive and negative consequences.

  • A study of high-school students conducted before and after AI became mainstream found no increase in the percentage of students who cheat.

  • 15-25 percent of students across several studies feel AI should not be allowed at all in education or refuse to use it themselves.

  • In a survey asking students why they use AI, the strongest agreement was with the statement that AI “will not judge me” followed by anonymity.

  • Four out of five students think their institutions have not integrated AI sufficiently.

  • 55 percent of students think overreliance on AI in teaching decreases the value received from a course.

  • 89 percent are worried about AI grading.

  • Students think AI is important, in other words, but not that it should replace professors.

    Read more in The Chronicle of Higher Ed

My Me-ness

“I cannot figure out what I am supposed to do with my life if these things can do anything I can do faster and with way more detail and knowledge.” The student said he felt crushed. Some heads nodded. But not all. Julia, a senior in the history department, jumped in. “The A.I. is huge. A tsunami. But it’s not me. It can’t touch my me-ness. It doesn’t know what it is to be human, to be me.” - D. Graham Burnett writing in The New Yorker