22 Articles about AI & Academic Scholarship

Fraud, AI slop and huge profits: is science publishing broken? (a podcast) – The Guardian

AI-generated ‘participants’ can lead social science experiments astray, study finds – Science

AI tools could reduce the appeal of predatory journals – Nature

Fake microscopy images generated by AI are indistinguishable from the real thing. – Chemistry World

The Machines Finding Life That Humans Can’t See – The Atlantic

Can researchers stop AI making up citations? - Nature 

AI models are using material from retracted scientific papers – MIT Tech Review

AI tool detects LLM-generated text in research papers and peer reviews – Nature

Prestige over merit: An adapted audit of LLM bias in peer review – Cornell University arXiv

Chatbots and large language models are being used to fact-check scientific work, but how effective are they? – Q.space 

Far more authors use AI to write science papers than admit it, publisher reports – Science  

What do researchers acknowledge ChatGPT for in their papers? – London School of Economics  

The rising danger of AI-generated images in nanomaterials science and what we can do about it – Nature

ChatGPT Fails to Flag Retracted and Problematic Articles – The Scientist  

Beyond ‘we used ChatGPT’: a new way to declare AI in research – Research Professional News  

Study looks at how biomedical journal editors-in-chief feel about AI use in their journals. – Springer

AI-generated medical data can sidestep usual ethics review, universities say – Nature

AI could be used for a Research Excellence Framework, says Royal Society president – Research Professional News  

Can Generative AI Restore Hope or Result in a Decline in the Quest for Academic Integrity – Sage  

When AI rejects your grant proposal: algorithms are helping to make funding decisions - Nature  

We risk a deluge of AI-written ‘science’ pushing corporate interests – here’s what to do about it – The Conversation

Far more authors use AI to write science papers than admit it, publisher reports – Science

24 Articles about AI & Academic Scholarship

Peer Review Paranoia The system is built on trust between scholars. AI is undermining that. – Chronicle of Higher Ed

AI Makes Research Easy. Maybe Too Easy. – Wall Street Journal

AI-generated scientific hypotheses lag human ones when put to the test – Science.org

JAMA Editors on Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review – JAMA  

AI tool labels more than 1000 journals for ‘questionable,’ possibly shady practices - Science.org

AI for Scientific Integrity: Detecting Ethical Breaches, Errors, and Misconduct in Manuscripts – Frontiers  

What counts as plagiarism? AI-generated papers pose new risks - Nature

Image fraud in nuclear medicine research – Springer

Does ChatGPT Ignore Article Retractions and Other Reliability Concerns? - Wiley

NIH to reject research applications written by AI – Beckers Hospital Review

AI-based fake papers are a new threat to academic publishing says journal editor – Times Higher Ed 

AI-Assisted Tools for Scientific Review Writing: Opportunities and Cautions. – ACS Publications 

Comparing AI-generated and human peer reviews: A study on 11 articles – Science Direct 

Evaluating the potential risks of employing large language models in peer review - Wiley

One-fifth of computer science papers may include AI content – Science.org

Artificial intelligence as author: Can scientific reviewers recognize GPT-4o-generated manuscripts? - Science Direct 

Fraudulent Scientific Papers Are Rapidly Increasing, Study Finds – New York Times 

AI can’t learn from what researchers don’t share – Research Professional News

AI content is tainting preprints: how moderators are fighting back.” - Nature

AI can simplify the process enormously and help publishers get ahead of the industry’s upheavals,” says publisher’s head of marketing. – Research Information

 AI Writing Disclosures Are a Joke. Here’s How to Improve Them. - Chronicle of Higher Ed

Make all research data available for AI learning, scientists urge – Research Professional News

Machine learning model flags almost 10 percent of cancer research literature as being paper mill papers – Biorxiv

AI-based research mentors: Plausible scenarios and ethical issues – Taylor & Francis Online  

17 Articles about AI & Academic Scholarship

Can academics use AI to write journal papers? What the guidelines say – The Conversation  

My paper was probably reviewed by AI – and that’s a serious problem – Times Higher Ed

Disclosing generative AI use for writing assistance should be voluntary – Sage Publishing  

AI-mediated translation presents two possible futures for academic publishing in a multilingual world - Public Library of Science Journal

The impact of language models on the humanities and vice versa – Nature

AI’s hyperbole making academic papers ‘more difficult to read’ – Times Higher Ed

Have you received a peer review that appeared to have been written by AI? – Dynamic Ecology

We Need AI Standards for Scholarly Publishing: A NISO Workshop Report – Scholarly Kitchen

University of Limerick to investigate how AI text was part of book written by senior academic – Irish Examiner

Web-scraping AI bots cause disruption for scientific databases and journals – Nature

A.I. Is Poised to Rewrite History. Literally. – New York Times

Predicting retracted research: a dataset and machine learning approaches – Research Integrity Journal 

Are those research participants in your study really bots? – Science Direct

Can AI help authors prepare better risk science manuscripts? – Wiley 

Paper rejected for AI, fake references published elsewhere with hardly anything changed – Retraction Watch

And Plato met ChatGPT: an ethical reflection on the use of chatbots in scientific research writing, with a particular focus on the social sciences – Nature

To ‘publish or perish’, do we need to add ‘AI or die’? – Times Higher Ed

17 Articles about AI & Academic Scholarship

Can generative AI replace humans in qualitative research studies? - Techxplore

The recent reduction in spelling error rates in academic papers could be due to an increased use of LLMs – OSF Preprints  

AI linked to explosion of low-quality biomedical research papers - Nature 

Flood of AI-assisted research ‘weakening quality of science'” – Times Higher Ed

Shoddy study designs and false findings using a large public health dataset portend future risk of exploitation by AI and paper mills – PLOS Biology

Is it OK for AI to write science papers? Nature survey shows researchers are split - Nature

MIT Says It No Longer Stands Behind Student’s AI Research Paper – Wall Street Journal  

Meta releases new data set, AI model aimed at speeding up scientific research – Semafor

Experiment using AI-generated posts on Reddit draws fire for ethics concerns – Retraction Watch

AI-Reddit study leader gets warning as ethics committee moves to ‘stricter review process’ – Retraction Watch  

Why misuse of generative AI is worse than plagiarism – Springer

Science sleuths flag hundreds of papers that use AI without disclosing it - Nature

Google engineer withdraws preprint after getting called out for using AI – Retraction Watch

Scientific Data Fabrication and AI—Pandora’s Box – JAMA Network

AI summary ‘trashed author’s work’ and took weeks to be corrected – Times Higher Ed

AI language models increasingly shape economics research writing, study finds – Phys.org

Artificial intelligence in vaccine research and development: an umbrella review – Frontiers

23 Articles about AI & Academic Scholarship

AI bots are overwhelming some journals – C&EN 

AI research summaries ‘exaggerate findings’, study warns – Times Higher Ed

Ethics in Academic Research: Who Is Responsible for Unethical Practices—AI, Scholars, Editors, or Institutions? – PrePrints

A Scanning Error Created a Fake Science Term—Now AI Won’t Let It Die - Gizmodo

GenAI Footprint in Scholarly Publications Reflects Complex Issues of Ac. Integrity Post-Plagiarism (video) - PUPP 

AI is transforming peer review — and many scientists are worried – Nature

A Shortcut or a Level Up? Harvard Faculty Debate Generative AI in Academia – The Crimson

Publishers Embrace AI as Research Integrity Tool – Inside Higher Ed 

AI tools are spotting errors in research papers: inside a growing movement – Nature

AI search summaries cannibalise academic publishers’ web traffic – Times Higher Ed

An academic paper written by AI passed peer review — but it’s a bit more nuanced than that – Tech Crunch

Trying to Write an Academic Paper with LLM Assistance – Scholarly Kitchen  

Academic publishers warn against AI copyright plans - Research Professional News – Research Professional News  

AI detectors are poor western blot classifiers: a study of accuracy and predictive values – PeerJ  

Will AI jeopardize science photography? – Nature

Can AI Solve the Peer Review Crisis? - IZA Institute of Labor Economics 

Publishers need to provide guidelines on use of AI in research, says Wiley – Chemistry World  

ChatGPT to help peer review scientific studies in UK Government trial – Telegraph

Generative artificial intelligence usage guidelines for scholarly publishing: a cross-sectional study of medical journals – BMC Medicine  

Retractions Increase 10-Fold in 20 Years - and Now AI is Involved – AAPS News

A viral video reveals how an AI-generated mistake led to nearly two dozen flawed research papers – Economic  Times  

Is AI the new research scientist? Not so, according to a human-led study. – University of Florida  

The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Academic Writing and Publishing Papers – Research Gate

AI & Academic Research

Although today’s AI products are cast in the role of assistants, AI might eventually come to dominate the peer-review process, with the human reviewer’s role reduced or cut out altogether. Some enthusiasts see the automation of peer review as an inevitability — but many researchers, as well as journal publishers, view it as a disaster. -Nature

AI & Academic Research Prediction

A recent survey by Wiley found that while the majority of researchers believe AI skills will be critical within two years, more than 60 percent said lack of guidelines and training keep them from using it in their work. -Inside Higher Ed

An Arms Race of Research Misconduct

Retractions are rising in medical research literature, even as more eyes examine peer-reviewed papers for accuracy. AI is powering an arms race in the world of research misconduct, making it easier for scientific fraud to occur, and for editors to identify and root out. In 2002, 1 in 5,000 papers were retracted, Oransky said. In 2023 retractions increased to 1 in 500 papers. -AAPS news magazine

18 Articles about AI & Academic Scholarship

What are the best AI tools for research? Nature’s guide - Nature

Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Peer Review: Insights from Journal Reviewers – Springer

OpenAI unveils a new ChatGPT agent for ‘deep research’ – TechCrunch

AI-Generated Junk Science Is a Big Problem on Google Scholar, Research Suggests – Gizmodo 

What happens when you let ChatGPT assess impact case studies? – London School of Economics  

Generative AI in the research process – A survey of researchers’ practices and perceptions – Science Direct 

Springer Nature offers to sell authors “AI Summaries of Their Own Work” – Futurism

Teens Are Doing AI Research Now. Is That a Good Thing? - Chronicle of Higher Ed

How is content generated by ChatGPT infiltrating scientific papers published in premier journals? – Wiley

Elsevier denies AI use in response to evolution journal board resignations – Retraction Watch  

Springer Nature reveals AI-driven tool to 'automate some editorial quality checks' – The Bookseller 

Nvidia unveils $3,000 desktop AI computer for home researchers - ArsTechnica 

Generative artificial intelligence and academic writing: friend or foe? - Elsevier

Detecting Research Misconduct in the Age of Artificial Intelligence – The Scientist

Can AI-generated podcasts boost science engagement? – Nature

AI-Authored Abstracts ‘More Authentic’ Than Human-Written Ones – Inside Higher Ed

Scholars Are Supposed to Say When They Use AI. Do They? - Chronicle of Higher Ed 

Will ChatGPT Get Tenure? - Leiden Vladtrice

16 Articles about AI & Academic Scholarship

Publishers are selling papers to train AIs — and making millions of dollars – Nature

Can AI fix the peer review bottleneck? Top journals weigh in  - News-Medical.Net

Suspected Undeclared Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Academic Literature: An Analysis of the Academ-AI Dataset - Arxiv

Can Google Scholar survive the AI revolution? - Nature

Rethinking Reviewer Fatigue AI’s place in a broader discussion -  EON

Writing assistant, workhorse, or accelerator? How academics are using GenAI – London School of Economics

Can AI review the scientific literature — and figure out what it all means? – Nature

The great AI witch hunt: Reviewers’ perception and (Mis)conception of generative AI in research writing – Science Direct

Can AI be used to assess research quality? – Nature

Scholarly Publishing World Slow to Embrace Generative AI – Inside Higher Education

National Academies President on How to Use Generative AI Responsibly in Scientific Research – JAMA

Study of ChatGPT citations makes dismal reading for publishers – Tech Crunch

Experts fail to reliably detect AI-generated histological data – Nature

AI-authored abstracts ‘more authentic’ than human-written ones – Times Higher Ed

AI’s computing gap: academics lack access to powerful chips needed for research – Nature  

AI-generated survey responses could make research less accurate – and a lot less interesting – Stanford

16 Articles about AI & Academic Scholarship

Google's new AI tool transforms dense research papers into accessible conversations - try it free - ZDnet 

Optimizing Large-Scale AI Model Pre-Training for Academic Research: A Resource-Efficient Approach – MarTech Post 

A group of experienced editorial board members struggled to distinguish human versus AI authorship – AHA Journals

AI can carry out qualitative research at unprecedented scale – London School of Economics  

Can AI be used to assess research quality? Chatbots and other tools are increasingly being considered, but people power is still seen as a safer option. – Nature  

Is AI the Answer to Peer Review Problems, or the Problem Itself? – Scholarly Kitchen 

Is Detecting genAI in Scholarly Research Beside the Point? – Clear Skies Adam

Unleashing the power of AI in science-key considerations for materials data preparation – Nature 

UK Research and Innovation tells reviewers they must not use generative AI – Research Professional News 

In which fields can ChatGPT detect journal article quality – ARXIV

Overcoming Skepticism Through Experimentation: The Role of AI in Transforming Peer Review – Scholarly Kitchen

If generative AI accelerates science, peer review needs to catch up - London School of Economics   

Some Thoughts on the Promise and Pitfalls of Innovation and Technology in Peer Review - Scholarly Kitchen

Is AI the Answer to Peer Review Problems, or the Problem Itself? - Scholarly Kitchen 

Do AI models produce more original ideas than researchers? – Nature  

How Gen AI Could Transform Scholarly Publishing: Themes and Reflections from Interviews with Industry Leaders - Scholarly Kitchen

11 Interesting Quotes about AI & Academic Research

Our findings suggest that AI tools are not yet ready to take on the task of editing academic papers without extensive human intervention to generate useful prompts, evaluate the output, and manage the practicalities. - Science Editor

If AI-generated papers flood the scientific literature, future AI systems may be trained on AI output and undergo model collapse. This means they may become increasingly ineffectual at innovating. - The Conversation

In a set of 300 fake and real scientific papers, the AI-based tool, named 'xFakeSci', detected up to 94 per cent of the fake ones. - Deccan Herald

People will say, I have 100 ideas that I don’t have time for. Get the AI Scientist to do those. - Nature

There are signs that AI evaluations of academic papers could be corrupting the integrity of knowledge production. Up to 17 percent of reviews submitted to prestigious AI conferences in the last year were substantially written by large language models (LLMs), a recent study estimated. - Chronicle of Higher Ed

Google just created a version of its search engine free of all the extra junk it has added over the past decade-plus. All you have to do is add udm=14 to the search URL. - Tedium

It’s possible to switch back to an AI-free search experience. Google has added a new Web tab to its search engine page at the same time as introducing these new AI features. You can configure this kind of web search as the default. - PopSci

In a 2023 Nature survey of more than 1,600 scientists, almost 30% said that they had used generative AI tools to help write (academic) manuscripts. - Nature

The highest-profile research is heavily influenced by cultural forces and career incentives that are not necessarily aligned with the dispassionate pursuit of truth. To get your research published in high-impact journals it helps enormously not to challenge the predominant narrative. Scientific narratives can become entrenched and self-reinforcing. And that’s where we are in climate science. - Chronicle of Higher Ed

How big is science’s fake-paper problem? An unpublished analysis shared with Nature suggests that over the past two decades, more than 400,000 research articles have been published that show strong textual similarities to known studies produced by paper mills. - Nature

The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the country's top science institute, on Tuesday published new guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific research, as part of its efforts to improve scientific integrity and reduce research misconduct, such as data fabrication and plagiarism. - Global Times

18 Articles about AI & Academic Scholarship

Do AI models produce more original ideas than researchers? - Nature

Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats: A Comprehensive SWOT Analysis of AI and Human Expertise in Peer Review – Scholarly Kitchen

How Are AI Chatbots Changing Scientific Publishing? – Science Friday

New academic AI guidelines aim to curb research misconduct – Global Times

Generative AI-assisted Peer Review in Medical Publications: Opportunities Or Trap – JRIM Publications

GPT-fabricated scientific papers on Google Scholar: preempting evidence manipulation – Harvard

AI Editing: Are We There Yet? - Science Editor – Science Editor  

AI tool claims 94% accuracy in telling apart fake from real research papers – Deccan Herald  

AI firms must play fair when they use academic data in training – Nature

AI Scientists Have a Problem: AI Bots Are Reviewing Their Work ChatGPT – Chronicle of Higher Ed 

A list of more than 500 papers with clear evidence of generative AI use - Academ-AI

Is AI my co-author? The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific publishing – Taylor & Francis Online 

Is ChatGPT a Reliable Ghostwriter? – The Journal of Nuclear Medicine

A new ‘AI scientist’ can write science papers without any human input. Here’s why that’s a problem – The Conversation

Could science be fully automated? A team of machine-learning researchers has now tried. - Nature

How AI tools help students—and their professors—in academic research – Fast Company  

AI-Generated Junk Science Research a Growing Problem, Experts Say – PYMNTS  

Did a criminal Russian academic paper mill use AI to plagiarize a BYU professor and his student? – Deseret News

22 Articles about AI & Academic Scholarship

AI tools for researchers: Key insights for librarians to enhance academic support – Springer Nature

OpenResearcher: An Open-Source Project that Harnesses AI to Accelerate Scientific Research – Marktechpost

Has your paper been used to train an AI model? Almost certainly - Nature

Flood Of 'Junk': How AI Is Changing Scientific Publishing - Barrons

How do I cite generative AI in MLA style? - Modern Language Association

AI scientists are producing a host of new theories of how our brains learn – The Economist 

Should scientists be paid when AI chatbots use their work? – Chemistry World

Artificial intelligence in scientific medical writing: Legitimate and deceptive uses and ethical concerns – Science Direct  

Revisiting the ‘Research Parasite’ Debate in the Age of AI – Undark  

AI is complicating plagiarism. How should scientists respond? – Nature

Woefully Insufficient Publisher Policies on Author AI Use Put Research Integrity at Risk – Scholarly Kitchen  

Academic authors 'shocked' after Taylor & Francis sells access to their research to Microsoft AI – The Bookseller 

Research findings strongly argue against the use of free AI detectors to detect fake scientific images - arXiv

Another paper with an anatomically incorrect image has been retracted – Retraction Watch 

Universities Don’t Want AI Research to Leave Them Behind – Wall Street Journal

AI Finds That AI Is Great In New Garbage Research From Tony Blair Institute – 404 Media  

Delving into ChatGPT usage in academic writing through excess vocabulary - arXiv 

AI threatens scientific research with fake papers – The Saturday Paper  

The role of ChatGPT in developing systematic literature searches: an evidence summary - Journal of the European Association for Health Information and Libraries

A Look Under the Hood of Scopus AI: Elsevier’s search tool for scholarly testing – Scholarly Kitchen  

How to cite ChatGPT in APA Style –  American Psychological Association

10 Best AI Tools for Research – BeeBom

15 Articles about AI & Academic Scholarship

The advent of human-assisted peer review by AI – Nature  

The Impact of AI on Academic Research and Publishing – Arxiv  

A Rapid Investigation of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content Footprints in Scholarly Publications – UTP Journals

Fake science in fraudulent papers is on the rise - The Week

Flood of Fake Science Forces Multiple Journal Closures – Wall Street Journal

Researchers warned against using AI to peer review academic papers – Semafor

Guidelines for academics aim to lessen ethical pitfalls in generative-AI use – Nature

Artificial intelligence content detection in ASCO scientific abstracts from 2021 to 2023 - Journal of Clinical Oncology   

Software that detects ‘tortured acronyms’ in research papers could help root out misconduct | Science - AAAS  

Guidance needed for using artificial intelligence to screen journal submissions for misconduct – Sage  

Academic Writers on AI: An Oxford University Press Study – Publishing Perspectives

Report: Most researchers use AI tools despite distrusting it – Inside Higher Ed 

With hallucinations waning, AI is diving deeper into scientific research – The Next Web

Fake Scientific Studies Are a Problem That’s Getting Harder to Solve – Bloomberg

Wiley shuts 19 scholarly journals amid AI paper mill problems – The Register

A Dozen Quotes about AI & Academic Scholarship

AI chatbots have thoroughly infiltrated scientific publishing. One percent of scientific articles published in 2023 showed signs of generative AI’s potential involvement, according to a recent analysis - Scientific American 

The journey from research data generation to manuscript publication presents many opportunities where AI could, hypothetically, be used – for better or for worse. - Technology Network

Is ChatGPT corrupting peer review? There are telltale words that hint at AI use. A study of review reports identifies dozens of adjectives that could indicate text written with the help of chatbots. - Nature 

Should researchers use AI to write papers? This group aims to release a set of guidelines by August, which will be updated every year - Science.org

Generative AI firms should stop ripping off publishers and instead work with them to enrich scholarship, says Oxford University Press’ David Clark. - Times Higher Ed 

Here are three ways ChatGPT helps me in my academic writing. Generative AI can be a valuable aid in writing, editing and peer review – if you use it responsibly - Nature 

New detection tools powered by AI have lifted the lid on what some are calling an epidemic of fraud in medical research and publishing. Last year, the number of papers retracted by research journals topped 10,000 for the first time. - DW News (video) 

Estimating the prevalence of ChatGPT "contamination” in the scholarly literature: It is estimated that at least 60,000 papers (slightly over 1% of all articles) were LLM-assisted - ArXiiv 

AI-Generated Texts from LLM has infiltrated the realm of scientific writing? We confirmed and quantified the widespread influence of AI-generated texts in scientific publications across many scientific domains - BioRxiv 

Georgetown found that American scholarly institutions and companies are the biggest contributors to AI safety research, but it pales in comparison to the amount of overall studies into AI, raising questions about public and private sector priorities. - Semafor 

Google Books is indexing low quality, AI-generated books that will turn up in search results, and could possibly impact Google Ngram viewer, an important tool used by researchers to track language use throughout history. - 404Media

The Association of Research Libraries announced a set of seven guiding principles for university librarians to follow in light of rising generative AI use. - Inside Higher Ed

13 Articles about the Impact of AI on Scholarly Research

Is AI ready to mass-produce lay summaries of research articles? – Nature  

The Latest “Crisis” — Is the Research Literature Overrun with ChatGPT- and LLM-generated Articles? – Scholarly Kitchen

Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews - Arxiv

Peer Review and Scientific Publishing Are Faltering – Medscape

Silicon Valley is pricing academics out of AI research - The Washington Post

Generative artificial intelligence and scientific publishing: urgent questions, difficult answers – The Lancet  

Is ChatGPT making scientists hyper-productive? The highs and lows of using AI – Nature

Authorship and ChatGPT: a Conservative View – Springer

AI-generated images and video are here: how could they shape research? – Nature

Fake academic papers are on the rise: why they’re a danger and how to stop them – The Conversation

Paul M. Sutter Thinks We’re Doing Science (and Journalism) Wrong – Undark

More published research should be debunked and retracted, watchdogs say – Wisconsin Public Radio

How Science Sleuths Track Down Bad Research – Wall Street Journal

18 Articles about AI & Academic Research

Could AI Disrupt Peer Review?  Publishers’ policies lag technological advances - Spectrum

The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Writing Scientific Review Articles - Springer

‘Obviously ChatGPT’ — how reviewers accused me of scientific fraud - Nature

AI could accelerate scientific fraud as well as progress - Economist  

Researchers plan to release guidelines for the use of AI in publishing - Chemical & Engineering News

ChatGPT use shows that the grant-application system is broken - Nature   

Detecting fraud in scientific publications: the perils and promise of AI - Science Pod 

The Science family of journals is adopting the use of Proofig, an artificial intelligence (AI)–powered image-analysis tool- Science Magazine  

Can ChatGPT and Other AI Bots Serve as Peer Reviewers? - ACS Publishing  

AI Use in Manuscript Preparation for Academic Journals - Cornell University 

As scientists face a flood of papers, AI developers aim to help New tools show promise, but technical and legal barriers may hinder widespread use - Science Magazine  

Is AI leading to a reproducibility crisis in science? – Nature  

Affiliation Bias in Peer Review of Abstracts by a Large Language Mode - JAMA

AI copilots and robo-labs turbocharge research - Axios 

Editing companies are stealing unpublished research to train their AI - Times Higher Ed 

How journals are fighting back against a wave of questionable images - Nature  

Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality? - Cornell University   

The JSTOR Daily Sleuth - Jstor

10 Articles about AI & Academic Research

Generative AI – the latest scapegoat for research assessment – London School of Economics

How ChatGPT and other AI tools could disrupt scientific publishing – Nature

Editors’ Statement on the Responsible Use of Generative AI Technologies in Scholarly Journal – Wiley Online  

Scientists prefer feedback from ChatGPT to judgement by peers – New Scientist    

Will ChatGPT Transform Research? It Already Has, Say Nobelists – Inside Higher Ed

‘We’re All Using It’: Publishing Decisions Are Increasingly Aided by AI. That’s Not Always Obvious. – Chronicle of Higher Ed

A machine-learning tool can easily spot when chemistry papers are written using the chatbot ChatGPT – Nature  

Who Published It? – Asian Scientist

Transparency in research: An analysis of ChatGPT usage acknowledgment by authors across disciplines and geographies - Taylor & Francis Online

Science journals overturn ban on ChatGPT-authored papers – Times Higher Ed

9 articles about AI & Academic Scholarship

AI beats human sleuth at finding problematic images in research papers – Nature  

Signs of undeclared ChatGPT use in papers mounting - Retraction Watch

Spitting out the AI Gobbledegook sandwich: a suggestion for publishers - Dorothy V. M. Bishop blog

AI destroys principles of authorship. A scary case from educational technology publishing. - Marco Kalz blog

Artificial Intelligence–Generated Research in the Literature: Is It Real or Is It Fraud? - Mary Ann Liebert Publishers   

ChatGPT used in peer reviews of Australian Research Council grant applications – itnews  

As scientists explore AI-written text, journals hammer out policies – Science.org

Use of AI Is Seeping Into Academic Journals—and It’s Proving Difficult to Detect – Wired

Draft law in China sets out penalties for AI-aided academic writing – University World News